34-minute video confuses fuel dumps, other spraying with ‘chemtrails;’ 110-minute video cites environmental damage possibly linked to chemtrails; 8-minute video of historical precedence to plane-spray civilians with deadly chemicals

hat tip: zengardner

My March 20th article with three minutes of video attracted two prolific commenters (Colophon and Thor) claiming these are not chemtrails, but condensation trails from engine and environmental effects. I invited their responses for this follow-up article; they are below.

I had originally stated that the following 34-minute video from NWOResistance HereAndNow refuted contrail arguments because it shows spraying from various nozzle locations on different planes, such as at these video times:

  • 10:21: one wing nozzle spraying chemicals.
  • 13:30: one wing large nozzle spraying chemicals.
  • 14:02: two tail arrays of nozzles (four per tail side) spraying chemicals.
  • 14:16: one nozzle on each side of the cabin spraying chemicals.
  • 14:20: two wing nozzles spraying chemicals.
  • 25:30: two wing nozzles spraying chemicals.

The documentation of Thor and Colophon (links/video below) show:

  • 10:21: fuel dump for an emergency landing.
  • 13:30: no source of further information.
  • 14:02: corexit spray in the Gulf of Mexico (a huge concern).
  • 14:16: government and media claim of “mosquito spraying.”
  • 14:20: NASA vortice text with smoke spray.
  • 25:30: fuel dump.

I appreciate Thor and Colphon’s contributions for factual accuracy. I have changed the article title, and have these concerns:

  1. I have witnessed an explosion of these “trails” in the NoCal Bay Area skies over the past few years.
  2. The below documentation of large-scale government crimes “covered” by official and corporate media lies has me be concerned that chemical spraying might be “covered” as contrails.

This 110-minute video from GeoEngineering Watch explains possible motives of weather, food, and population control:

In additional evidence, consider this 1-minute BBC advert for the 2013 Wimbledon Tennis tournament that intentionally includes CGI multiple chemtrails added to the skies in the commercial. This is from the same BBC that lies in commission and omission about the UK/US lie-started and Orwellian illegal current wars. This appears to be propaganda to “normalize” chemtrails.

For historical context, this 8-minute video from HowStuffWorks documents five previous cases to disperse deadly chemicals via plane aerosols to an unknowing public:

Thrive’s documentation: Danger: Chemtrails – Aerial spraying of toxic chemicals:

Over a hundred patents [1] have been granted to major corporations, including Monsanto, for aerial spraying of materials that can penetrate your lungs and blood, cause disease, disrupt your mental capacity, cause you to be sterile and even cause premature death.

The government has refused to test samples collected underneath the trails. Now a TV news report from Germany has confirmed that their military is in fact doing aerial spraying of chemtrails.[2]  An article from the NIH, the National Institutes of Health, confirms that not only are chemtrails real, but they are suspected to be responsible for a variety of neurotoxic conditions including MS.[3]

Intense spraying of dangerous chemicals from planes has been reported in, at least, the US, Canada, Germany, England, Australia, Mexico, South Africa, Bahamas, Puerto Rico and Croatia. A nasty mixture of parasites, pathogens, toxic heavy metals and nano-engineered particles have been found falling to earth from the trails of certain planes. Aluminum, barium, bacillus spores, radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold spores, yellow mycototoxins, ethylene dibromide and synthetic nano-fibers are among the ingredients found in collected samples.[4]

Want to Know’s documentation: Chemtrails, Geoengineering, and background on human experimentation (and here).

The militaries and intelligence agencies of many countries have been conducting secret tests on their soldiers, and even their citizens for many decades. Adamant denials are often issued in response to any inquiries on these tests. But then, sometimes only decades later, the truth is revealed in public testimony, as happened in the 1975 Senate Church Committee hearings on the CIA’s secret experiments. Excerpts from a Wall Street Journal article below show that “open-air tests of biological agents were conducted 239 times” by the US military. Yet all of this was kept secret from the public for decades, including the resulting casualties.

Declassified government documents show that as early as 1950, the San Francisco bay area was secretly sprayed by the US military with what was thought to be a harmless microbe to test aerosol dispersion. According to a 2004 San Francisco Chronicle article on this, “army tests showed that the bacterial cloud had exposed hundreds of thousands of people in a broad swath of Bay Area communities.” At least one person died and 11 were hospitalized as a result of this test.

More recently, J. Marvin Herndon, a renowned geophysicist whose groundbreaking work has been reported in the Washington Post and more, has confirmed aerial spraying of aluminum on a wide scale, which he says is threatening the health of humanity and our planet. In the abstract for one of his scientific papers, he states:

“In response to an urgent call through an article in Current Science for assistance to understand the geological association of high aluminum mobility with human health in the Ganga Alluvial Plain, I describe evidence of clandestine geoengineering activity that has occurred for at least 15 years, and which has escalated sharply in the last two years. The geoengineering activity via tanker-jet aircraft emplaces a non-natural, toxic substance in the Earth’s atmosphere which with rainwater liberates highly mobile aluminum.”

Please note that the two commenters of my article ignored eight total requests if they see anything at all illegal of government actions (although commenter Colophon e-mailed me in agreement of War Crimes and others requiring arrests). Ignoring government crimes is consistent with government propagandists and in common-sense violation that anyone caring to do the research they claim would find nothing illegal among the following Emperor’s New Clothes obvious:

The above facts are by definition consistent with a chemtrail purpose to weaken, kill, and control large portions of populations. Even if you’re unsure about chemtrail evidence, illegal and lie-started wars are required and basic citizen knowledge to honor all our families’ sacrifices through two  devastating world wars.

Demanding arrests as the required and obvious public response:

The obvious categories of US .01% “leaders’” crimes include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

Colophan and Thor’s points on three topics:

1. Regarding the March 20th article’s 2-minute video from GeoEngineering Watch:

Carl: I see full-wing spraying turning on and off.

Colophon (via May 17 e-mail):

The first video, as I explained in the comments, shows contrails from an EVA Air Boeing 777 en route from Taipei to San Francisco. The video was stolen without permission from Douglas Huang, who uploaded it in 2012. It was filmed from a China Airlines 747 which was following the same route.

I contacted Mr Huang to let him know that Dane had taken his video and added his own totally baseless narration to it. He filed a complaint with YouTube but for whatever reason they allowed it to stay up. Mr Huang has since taken his video down, for unknown reasons. Attached is a screenshot confirming the above.

Wouldn’t you agree this shows breathtaking dishonesty by Dane Wigington? Stealing a video without permission and adding a narration to claim it shows something that it clearly does not? Contrails are a well understood phenomenon. Due to increased air traffic and more efficient engines (with a corresponding increase in contrail factor) they are now becoming so common that contrail cloudiness is an issue that may require action. Have you seen the IPCC predicted maps of contrail cover by 2050? Making up nonsense about “spraying” simply distracts from real issues. Contrails are a minor factor in global warming, not “the greatest threat to humanity” as Dane likes to say.

You don’t need an expert witness to see that Dane Wigington is talking through his hat.

(after my request that he stick to what he sees, via May 17 e-mail):

They are aerodynamic contrails. You can see that they are coming from the entire control surface of the wing, not from the engines or any spraying nozzles.

Aerodynamic contrails can form if the air is very humid but just below saturation point. As the air passes over the wing, the pressure drops (this is how the wing generates lift). By Boyles Law (pV = nRT) if you decrease the pressure of a given volume of air, then the temperature will also decrease. Colder air can hold less water vapour than warmer air, therefore if you decease the temperature the relative humidity will increase.

If the pressure drop (and therefore temperature drop) is great enough, then the relative humidity will rise above the saturation point and therefore the air will hit the dewpoint and condensation will occur.

You can often see this at ground level when planes are landing, but at low altitudes the condensation quickly evaporates. You can see it for example here: from about 0:05 condensation is blooming from the entire wing surface.  https://youtu.be/Nfd8gwK-oh4

Now you may say “Ah ha but that condensation only lasts for a few seconds, Dane’s video shows a persistent trail”. That’s because Dane’s video shows a B777 at cruise altitude. At cruise altitude, if aerodynamic contrails form then the condensation will often glaciate (freeze). Once the droplets have frozen they will act like exhaust contrails (or indeed cirrus clouds) do, and therefore they will persist if the conditions allow.

I have given a rather simplified version of how aerodynamic contrails form. There’s a much more in depth analysis of the parameters required in this paper published in the Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (American Meteorological Society: http://contrailscience.com/files/AC%20Phenomenology%20and%20flow%20physics.pdf

I apologise if you’re offended by the ad hominem, but it gets a bit wearying being called a “troll” and a “shill” for trying to explain to people that contrails are not killing them, or (as Dane does) having comments explaining his videos deleted without ever appearing to the public.

(Correction: I should of course have said the ideal gas law, not Boyles Law, which is just one facet of the ideal gas law)

Thor: (from below comment):

The first question- colophon is exactly correct. Its an aerodynamic contrail. Formed by change in air pressure over the wing. Its different than an exhaust contrail. Here is scientific validation of their existence:
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008JAS2767.1

and much more:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=aerodynamic+contrail&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=

Moreover- here is the SAME pilot filming on a different day capturing the exact same phenomenon from a different angle:

(Carl response: this video certainly does NOT show persistent and thick effects as shown in the 2-minute video in this article! I invite all interested to view the video to confirm the view from Thor’s video is only and always directly at the plane and within one plane-length’s view.)

Thor: Sorry- I was refering to the image on the screen as the video is embedded in this thread- it is a screen shot of this video- this video is also an aerodynamic and was filmed by the same pilot:

(Carl question: Do you agree it’s possible to mask chemical spraying as persistent contrails, Thor?)

Thor: It’s really not that hard to review the relevant scientific and historical record over the last 60yrs and get a basic understanding of the scientific consensus and basic science involved. Logic would suggest that that would be the first place to start in terms of research on what is and isn’t possible in the atmosphere.

…and yet you cannot take that position and then turn around and claim you understand enough about “chemical spraying” to know if it could be “masked” by contrails. That’s a logical fallacy. Your appeal to authority notwithstanding.

(I noted to Thor he failed to answer the question, and asked again)

2. Regarding the above 34-minute video from NWOResistance HereAndNow at 10:21, 13:30, 14:02, 14:16, 14:20, 25:30:

Carl:

  • 10:21: I see one wing nozzle spraying chemicals.
  • 13:30: I see one wing large nozzle spraying chemicals.
  • 14:02: I see two tail arrays of nozzles (four per tail side) spraying chemicals.
  • 14:16: I see a nozzle on each side of the cabin spraying chemicals.
  • 14:20: I see two wing nozzles spraying chemicals.
  • 25:30: I see two wing nozzles spraying chemicals.

Colophon:

In answer to your question, the majority of those clips show emergency fuel dumping from aircraft. This is indeed a form of pollution but it is only done in an emergency if the aircraft has to land while still above the safe landing weight (for instance if a plane fuelled for a long flight has to return to the airport soon after takeoff).

It’s worth noting that fuel dumps do not form persistent trails (like contrails or what get called “chemtrails”) — the fuel quickly evaporates and does not form lasting clouds.

Two of the sections you mention are not fuel dumps. The one at 14:16 is a photo of a C-130 spraying for mosquitoes, taken from here: http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/07/10/low-flying-plane-is-on-a-mosquito-mission/

And the one at 14:20 appears to be a crop of this photo of a 1974 wake vortex study using smoke generators on a 747 (a photo that gets used a lot by chemtrailers) http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/about/Organizations/Technology/Facts/TF-2004-14-DFRC.html

Thor:

on the time stamps-

10:20 is a fuel dump- the original video is here:

13:30 not sure- looks like a fuel dump

14:02- AF spraying corexit in the gulf- here is the original image:
http://news.discovery.com/eart…
http://grist.org/article/2010-…

14:16- not sure.

14:20: is a NASA vortice test from 1974- here is the original picture which Wiggyton actually used but neglected to mention the source or the test:

Thumbnail

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Galle…

25:30; another fuel dump- here is the original video:

 

Alas, none of these are really the same thing as the trails coming from the engines of planes that people claim are ‘chemtrails’.

It took me about 30 minutes to source the originals of this supposed “proof”. Why havent you done this already?

Does it matter that the video in question is also filled with pictures of ballast tanks for flight testing and its being purveyed as “proof” of chemtrails. Don;t you see this disingenuous, lying propaganda for what it is?

Thumbnail

(Carl response: Thank you, Thor 🙂

So that seems to resolve a few of those images; I appreciate you looking. If you’re interested in the topic of large-scale crimes, you might look into the corexit chemical spraying, btw.

I’m still concerned about a few areas:

1. the 14:16 apparent chemical spraying from both sides of a plane’s cabin.
2. the apparent ability to dump chemicals indistinguishable from any natural occurring water condensation. Do you have a better answer for this point?
3. the context of what experts find as MASSIVE crimes of state centering in war, money, and lies. This is not a “meme”, straw man argument, or “politics” if you care to look. I am one such expert who can easily explain, document, and prove such government crimes, and invite anyone who cares to attempt refutation. You shouldn’t make such claims when you apparently haven’t looked. You may wish to do what I have done: ask and then look at the evidence.

You asked why I didn’t look for myself. I asked Colophon and you to provide what seems a topic of interest opportunity to express more than I think I could provide (Colophon says he’s a scientist and journalist).

Oh, the video does show tremendous volume coming from jet engines at the 15:47 mark, if you’d like to comment.

You also asked if the video is somehow propaganda since it shows images that are refuted as “chemtrails.” I answer that I don’t think so. “We the People” are indeed faced with massive crimes and only “hobby time” and resources to communicate our responses.

I find enough evidence of concern to appreciate the video.)

3. Regarding seeing any large government crimes, such as illegal and lie-started Wars of Aggression as documented in this article:

Carl: Please see this article’s documentation above.

Colophon: (via May 16 e-mail, and so far choosing to not include in my two article requests for public consideration)

There are plenty of areas where politicians should be subject to arrest. The fabricated WMD claims that led to the war in Iraq (which saw up to 3 million people take to the streets in protest in the UK and maybe 12 million people around the world) at the top end of the scale, the faked and inappropriate expenses claims we have seen from dozens of MPs at the other.

Then there are the countless examples of government policies being set with ulterior motives based on business interests. The systematic dismantling of the National Health Service is a great example – pushed through by politicians with ties to private healthcare companies which will benefit from privatisation. That’s an issue that is particularly close to my heart.

Thor: (from below comment):

The third question is also easy- I don’t trust the government. Sometimes they lie and cheat.

(my follow-up: “Thank you. Do you see any crimes requiring arrests, such as lie-started Wars of Aggression as documented in this article?”)

Thor: Again…the whole “crime against humanity” meme is a strawman. My politics have nothing to with whether “chemtrails” are real or not. I am here to discuss the facts regarding supposed “chemtrails”.

(My follow-up: The responsibility of citizen understanding of basic laws is something you see as “politics”? I won’t ask again, but with all families sacrificing through two world wars, you know nothing and have no curiosity about lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression in the present?

Say whatever you wish, Thor. I will contribute it to public understanding.)

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).

This entry was posted in General and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.