Alternative media Internet traffic in steep decline according to ‘statistics’: evidence of counterattack to keep .01% illegal rogue state empire from public recognition? Please look, and comment

Two paragraphs of context: CIA Director William Colby admitted to the US Senate in 1975 that they manipulate American corporate media for apparent purpose to “cover” obvious crimes centered in war, looting, and lying of US rogue state empire. 3-minutes of this history:

In November 2016, The Washington Post, President Obama, and corporate media launched the talking point of “fake news,” accusing a list of whistle-blowing websites that placed us as their 7th example. In 2017, leaked and declassified documents reveal more CIA psyops to conceal Emperor’s New Clothes facts from public recognition (and here).

Since the “fake news” psyops, SimilarWeb reports of Internet traffic show steep declines in alternative news page views. Data from some of my favorite sites from December 2016 to the latest data available of February 2017:

Want to Know: 400K to 189K  (- 53%)

Washington’s Blog: 620K to 397K  (- 36%)

What Really Happened: 1.75M to 1.3 M  (- 26%)

Activist Post: 1.35M to 950K  (- 30%)

Prison Planet: 2.35M to 1.4M  (- 40%)

David Icke: 2M to 1.5M  (-25%)

Project Camelot: 180K to 100K  (-44%)

Global Research: 3.2M to 3M  (- 7%)

Update with March data: I just checked and found three of the above eight sites rebounded slightly, with five declining further. Click on the above links to see for yourself.

Real decline for corporate media

I’ve reported decline of confidence in corporate media since I began writing in 2009. For examples from the last I looked in 2015:

According to a 2007 poll by the Pew Research Center, the majority of the American public see the US major media news organizations as politically biased, inaccurate, and uncaring. Among those who use the Internet, two-thirds report that major media news do not care about the people they report on, 59% say the news is inaccurate, 64% see bias, and 53% summarize their view on major media news as, “failing to stand up for America.” In their 2009 poll, “just 29% of Americans say that news organizations generally get the facts straight, while 63% say that news stories are often inaccurate.” Gallup’s 2014 poll recorded the lowest ever US public confidence in accurate news reporting from corporate media’s television news: 18%.

A June 2010 Rasmussen poll found 66% of voters “angry” at the media, with 33% “very angry.” Rasmussen also found 70% “angry” at current federal government policies. The most current Gallup poll in 2012 shows Americans’ distrust at an all-time high in the reporting from “mass media — such as newspapers, TV, and radio”: 60% have either “not very much” trust and confidence or “none at all” to “reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly.”

Real decline for alternative media, or fake statistics?

I got curious from our data reporting on Washington’s Blog, and decided to check other sites. I don’t believe the beginning of “fake news” with decline in data reporting to be a coincidence, and imagine that our “masters” would  plan multiple attacks on alternative media beyond “fake news” accusations. The manipulation of website traffic would seem to be an obvious choice to discourage alternative media.

What do you see? Please comment.

But whatever: the big picture is illegal rogue state empire requiring .01% arrests

Demanding .01% arrests as required truthful public response to defend Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness

Given the prima facie evidence, it’s unreasonable for Americans to “hope for change” from Donald Trump’s “leadership.” We the People must demand .01% arrests or continue to serve as minions and work animals to rogue state empire. Until .01% arrests prove real leadership to stop ongoing slaughter of millions of human beings, harm to billions, and looting of trillions, it is only reasonable for Americans to embrace the evidence only lightly summarized in this article to conclude ongoing illegal .01% empire under a new “teleprompter reader-in-chief,” lying psychopathic puppet, oligarchic tool on the Right hand of one vicious imperial political body.

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).
  4. Tens of trillions in looting, including $6.5 trillion just reported by the US Department of “Defense” as “lost.”

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

3-minute videoPolice, Military – Was your Oath sincere?


Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.


Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at

Note: has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere).

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.